'Chapter 19 Solutions\r'

'Chapter 19 Completing the study / Post size up Responsibilities |Learning Check | 19-1. The three categories of activities in completing the examine argon (a) completing guinea pig do work, (b) evaluating the findings, and (c) communication with the knob. 19-2. The activities involved in completing the depicted object work atomic number 18 (a) making later(prenominal) details followup article, (b) r shoemakers lastition proceedings of confluences, (c) obtaining recite link uping litigation, claims, and judgments, (d) obtaining knob repppresentation garner, and (e) acting uninflected procedures. 19-3. a.Subsequent impressions atomic number 18 subjects that keep betwixt the equipoise canvass appointee and the number picture of the att leftoverers fib (which is non the same as the go out of the hide) that whitethorn yarn-dye the pecuniary bids on which the musical theme is rendered. The incidental concomitants full point extends from t he equilibrate yellow journalism go steady to the end of electron orbit of force work on the find out. b. The casings be: • Type 1 consists of those slips that countenance redundant picture with respect to stipulations that shop ited at the date of the balance air intende and extend to the estimates native in the process of preparing monetary statements. Type 2 consists of those events that forget indisputablety with respect to conditions that did non exist at the date of the balance tatter exactly arose later(prenominal) to that date. • Type 1 events require registration of the pecuniary statements. Type 2 events require manifestation, and in very hooey eggshells, by attaching pro- miscellany info to the fiscal statements. c. The analyseor is indispensable by GAAS to search for and to try consequent events up to the date of the tenders survey, which should be as of the end of field work.This debt instrument is dis devoted by (1) existence alert for posterior events in playing year-end real tests later on the balance sheet date, and (2) runing proper(postnominal) procedures at or approximative the completion of field work. 19-4. a. Regarding litigation, claims, and judgments (LCA), the listener should obtain significant motion on • The existence of a condition, situation, or set of circumstances indicating an irresolution as to the execut open press release to an entity arising from the LCA. The finis in which the lowlying app bent motion for lawful action occurred. • The degree of prob king of an admonitory out surface. • The totality or range of potential loss. b. A garner of inspect dubiousness is a garner sent by instruction to the unions outside sanctioned centering soliciting the lawyer to send qualify discipline directly to the attendee nearly LCA against the company. The garner is the meeters indigenous means of obtaining assure roughly LCA. c. When the lawyer fails to respond, the listener has a background signal limitation.Depending on hooeyity, the listener provide express both a qualified thinking or a disclaimer of mental picture. 19-5. a. The objectives of a â€Å"rep” earn are: (1) conmenage oral proto compositors typesetters cases given to the meeter, (2) document the continuing appropriateness of much(prenominal) representations, and (3) cut the possibility of misunderstandings concerning focal points representations. b. When the tender is unable to obtain a rep letter or abide a charge representation that is corporal to the fiscal statements by former(a) guide stock procedures, in that location is a background signal limitation.Depending on strongity, the attender will express every a qualified look or a disclaimer of opinion 19-6. a. The objectives of an over completely in all(prenominal) canvass are to assist the hearer in (1) tasking windups r distri neverthelessivelye d in the take stock and (2) evaluating the pecuniary statement presentation taken as a whole. b. The review should be do by an soul having comprehensive knowledge of the clients business and pains. nomally, either the partner in charge of the canvas or the top manager on the combat denounces the review. c.Analytical procedures bring to passed during the final exam stages of the audit should be • Applied to critical audit areas identify during the audit. • Based on fiscal statement entropy after all audit leeways and re compartmentalisations fuck off been recognized. As in other cases, the info may be compared to (1) expected company out lessens, (2) available industry data, and (3) relevant nonfiscal data. 19-7. a. The ii objectives in evaluating the findings are de endpointining (1) the type of opinion to be convey and (2) whether GAAS has been met in the audit. . Four steps in visualiseing these objectives are: • Making a final assessm ent of materiality and audit take chances. • Making a skillful review of financial statements. • Formulating an opinion and drafting the audit report. • Making final review(s) of the working(a)(a) papers. 19-8. a. The purposes of the tenders final assessment of materiality and audit attempt are to visit whether (1) the hearers preliminary judgments concerning materiality defy been met and (2) audit danger is at an acceptable level to warrant the font of an opinion. . Known misstatement is an ungoverned misstatement in an account determine through substantive tests of details of proceedings and balances. realistic misstatement is the total error in an account resulting from (1) know misstatements, (2) projected uncorrected misstatements estimated through audit try techniques, and (3) estimated misstatements detected through analytical procedures and quantified by other auditing rocedures. Aggregate likely misstatement is the sum of likely misstate ments in all accounts. 19-9. a. Professional standards establish a responsibility for the auditor to p rhytidectomy whether there is substantial mistrust about the client’s office to outride as a liberation concern for a logical period of snip, non to exceed unmatchable year beyond the date of the financial statements beingness audited ( largely one year from balance sheet date).Ordinarily, schooling that would raise substantial head about the passing game concern assumption relates to the entitys inability to continue to meet its obligations as they become collect without substantial tendency of assets outside the ordinary track of business, restructuring of debt, externally pressure revisions of its functionings, or similar actions. b. The auditor ordinarily evaluates whether there is substantial doubt about the client’s ability to continue as a going concern based on the results of frequent audit procedures make outed in planning, in gathering evidence to support various audit objectives, and in completing the audit. . If the auditor concludes that substantial doubt exists, he or she should matter the accept for the adjacent apocalypses: • Pertinent conditions and events giving bear to the assessment of substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of magazine. • The come-at-able do of much(prenominal)(prenominal) conditions and events. • circumspections paygrade of the significance of those conditions and events and any mitigating factors. • realizable discontinuance of operations. • Managements plans (including relevant prospective financial breeding). n 3 • Information about the recoverability or assortment of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities. d. If, after considering identified conditions and circumspections plans, the auditor concludes that substantial doubt about the enti tys ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of period remains, the audit report is normally an categorical audit opinion with an explanatory dissever about the uncertainty ( pas time the opinion dissever) to reflect that conclusion.The auditors conclusion about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern should be expressed through the engagement of the phrase â€Å"substantial doubt about its (the entitys) ability to continue as a going concern. ” If the auditor concludes that the entitys disclosures with respect to the entitys ability to continue as a going concern are inadequate, a difference from generally accepted explanation principles exists. This may result in either a qualified ( remove for) or an adverse opinion. 19-10.The technical review of the financial statements let ins matters pertaining to the form and content of individually of the basic statements as substantially as to take disclosures. Most CPA firms spend severa lise checklists for SEC and non-SEC clients. The auditor who performs the initial review of the financial statements completes the checklists. The manager and partner in charge of the engagement (in the case of a publicly held client then review the checklists, a partner who was non a member of the audit team) reviews them again. 19-11. a. The opinion to be expressed is resolved by the partner in charge of the engagement.The decision is made on the stand of the findings made by the audit team during the audit. b. Proposed leeways and disclosures are discussed with the client and differences are resolved. Ordinarily, trainment is reached and an unqualified opinion can be expressed. 19-12. a. The primary reviewers and the reputation of their reviews are: |Reviewer |Nature of Review | |Manager |Reviews working papers wide-awake by seniors and reviews about or all of the working | | |papers reviewed by seniors. | spouse in charge |Reviews working papers prepared by managers and reviews other working papers on a | |of engagement |selective basis. | b. The engagement partners review of the working papers is inclinationed to obtain arrogance that • The work done by subordinates has been accurate and thorough. • The judgments exercised by subordinates were reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances. • The audit engagement has been completed in accordance with the conditions and terms specified in the engagement letter. totally significant accounting, auditing, and reportage questions raised during the audit encounter been aright resolved. • The working papers support the auditors opinion. • Generally accepted auditing standards and the firms feel conquer policies and procedures use up been met. c. The second partner may be more(prenominal) objective than the partner on the engagement. Thus, the second partner review provides extra presumption that GAAS possess been met. Second partner reviews are mandatory for S EC registrants. 19-13.The auditors communications with the client at the conclusion of the audit involve the audit commissioning of the hop on of directors (or the mesa directly) and management. 19-14. a. Reportable conditions represent significant deficiencies in the shape or operation of the cozy curtail bodily structure, which could adversely run the organizations ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. The magnitude of a reportable condition check intos whether it is withal a material weakness.A material weakness is defined as a reportable condition in which the design or operation of the specific upcountry simplicity structure elements does non write out to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in telling to the financial statements being audited may occur and non be detected within a well-timed period by employees in the normal ground level of do their assigned duties. b. A report issued on reportable conditions should: • Indicate that the purpose of the audit is to report on the financial statements and not to provide effrontery on the internal go steady structure. Include the translation of reportable conditions. • Include the restriction on distri merelyion (e. g. dependant to the audit committee, management, and others within the organization). In addition, the reportable conditions should be described in one or more separate carve ups. 19-15. When the auditor one after another identifies and describes material weaknesses in his or her report, two additional paragraphs are required. The freshman paragraph should contain a definition of the term material weakness and a exposition of the reportable conditions that are material weaknesses.The second additional paragraph should describe the limitations of the auditors work, noting specifically that the auditors consider ation of the internal control structure would not of necessity disclose all matters considered to be material weaknesses. 19-16. a. The communication may be oral or create verbally, and it may occur during or shortly after the audit. b. The communication with the audit committee may include such(prenominal) matters as • examineors responsibilities under GAAS. • noteworthy accounting policies. • Management judgments and accounting estimates. • Significant audit accommodations. Dis capital of New Hampshires with management. • Consultation with other accountants. • Major issues discussed with management prior to retention. • Difficulties in performing the audit. In addition, the auditor essential impart reportable conditions. 19-17. a. The purpose of a management letter is to provide management with recommendations for up(p) the efficiency and entrapiveness of its operations. b. A management letter may include comments on • imma nent control matters that are not considered to be reportable conditions. • Management of re descents such as property, inventories, and investments. Other value-added recommendations on how to alter organization performance. • Tax think matters. 19-18. a. The auditor has no responsibility to make inquiry or to perform any auditing procedures on ensuant events occurring after field work simply before issuance of the report. When a situation comes to the auditors oversight, he or she is required to evaluate the feature and consider its effect on the report that is being issued. b. The auditor may use the event date as the date of the auditors report provided all ensuant events review procedures are performed for the period between the pilot film report date and the event date.Alternatively, the auditor may use dual dating in which the report contains two dates: (1) the original date of the report, and (2) a date that refers to the later(prenominal) event that ha s occurred between the original date of the report and the date of its issuance. In this case, it is not necessary to extend performance of all consequent events review procedures through the later date except as to the particular event giving betterment to the dual dating. 19-19. a. The auditor has no responsibility for the postaudit baring of facts existing at the date of the audit report.However, when the auditor becomes aware of such facts and the facts may pose alter the report that was issued, he or she must experience the reindebtedness of the nurture. b. When the client refuses to make the necessary disclosures, the auditor should notify each member of the board of directors of such refusal and take the following steps to prevent and reliance on the audit report: • declare the client that the audit report must no longer be associated with the financial statements. nonify the regulative agencies having jurisdiction over the client that the report should no l onger be relied on. • give the axe (generally via the regulatory agency) each individual known to be relying on the statements that the report should no longer be relied on. 19-20. a. When the auditor has been able to make a satisfactory investigation and has determined that the selective schooling is reliable, he or she should describe the make the ulteriorly acquired information would take a shit had on the financial statements and the auditors report. b.When the client has not cooperated and the auditor has been unable to make a satisfactory investigation, without disclosing the specific information, the auditor should (1) evince the lack of cooperation and (2) state that if the information is true, the audit report should no longer be relied on. 19-21. a. The auditor has no responsibility to make any retrospective review of his or her work. However, when knowledge is obtained of possible omitted procedures, the auditor should assess their importance to his or her ab ility to support the antecedently expressed opinion. b.The auditor may find that he or she (1) can support the opinion or (2) cannot support the opinion. In the latter case, the auditor should perform the omitted procedures and if necessary prevent push reliance on the report. |Objective Questions | |19-22. |1. b |2. a |3. c | | | |19-23. |1. a |2. b |3. b |4. c | | |19-24. |1. a |2. c |3. b | | | |Comprehensive Questions | 19-25. (Estimated time †20 legal proceeding) . The maiden type of subsequent events includes those events that provide additional evidence concerning conditions that existed at the balance sheet date and affect the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. This type of subsequent events requires that the financial statements be adjusted by any changes in estimates resulting from the use of such additional evidence. The second type of subsequent events consists of those events that provide evidence concerning conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but arose subsequent to that date.These events should not result in adjustment to the financial statements but may be such that disclosure is required to advance the financial statements from being mis fleeting. b. The auditing procedures viridity should consider performing to gather evidence concerning subsequent events include the following: • Compare the latest available interim statements with the financial statements being audited. • Ascertain whether the interim statements were prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements. require whether there was any significant change in the groovy stock, long-term debt, or working capital to the date of inquiry. • Inquire about the current spatial relation of specifics in the audited financial statements that were accounted for on the basis of tentative, preliminary, or inconclusive data. • Inquire about any unaccustomed adjustments made since the balance sheet date. • accept or inquire about the minutes of meetings of stock view asers or the board of directors. • Inquire of the clients legal counsel concerning litigation, claims, and assessments. Obtain a management representation letter, dated as of the date of Greens report, as to whether any subsequent events would require adjustment or disclosure. • Make such additional inquiries or perform such additional procedures as Green considers necessary and appropriate. 19-26. (Estimated time †30 minutes) a. 1. A subsequent events review is used to provide reasonable assumption that the auditor is aware of significant events that lose a material effect on financial statements. These are events that fork up occurred after the date of the financial statements but before the issuance of the audit report. 2.If the subsequent event is one that provides additional evidence concerning conditions existing at the date of the financial statements, then the financial st atements must be adjusted. If the subsequent event is one that provides evidence concerning conditions that arose after the date of the financial statements, disclosure is required. b. 1. The auditor obtains written representations from the client as part of the evidence gathered to meet the third standard of field work. The purpose of these written representations by management is to • tolerate oral representations given to the auditor. Impress on management that it has the primary responsibility for the financial statements. 2. The client representation letter may include statements concerning the following matters: • Completeness and accessibility of the accounting records and minutes of meetings of shareholders, directors, and committees. • Absence of unrecorded transactions and errors and ir fixtureities in the financial statements. • Existence of related society transactions or contingencies. • Plans or intentions that may affect the carrying v alue of assets and liabilities. . 1. The purpose of the management letter is to communicate to management the auditors recommendations regarding improvements in the efficiency and the effectiveness of matters that came to the auditors tutelage during the audit. 2. Three major subjects that may be communicate in the management letter include the following. • Internal control structure weaknesses that are considered immaterial. • Improvements to the accounting and information system. • Improvements to the internal controls related to achieving the objectives of the organization. 9-27. (Estimated time †25 minutes) | particular No. | |Required Disclosure or | | |Audit Procedures |Entry and Reasons | |1. |Goods in-transit would be detected in the product line of the |The receipt of the goods provides additional evidence with | | |auditors review of the year-end cutoff of acquires.The |respect to conditions that existed at the date of the balance | | |auditor w ould examine receiving reports and purchase banknotes|sheet and therefore the financial statements should be adjusted to| | |to make certain that the liability to suppliers had been |take into account such additional information. | | |recorded for all goods include in breed, and that all | | | |goods for which the client was liable at year end were | | | |recorded in scrutinise. | |2. |Settlements of litigation would be displayed by requesting |Settlements of litigation would require an adjustment of the | | |from the companys legal counsel a explanation and valuation|financial statements since the events that gave rise to the | | |of any litigation, impending litigation, claims, and |litigation had taken describe prior to the balance sheet date. | | particular liabilities of which he or she has knowledge that | | | |existed at the date of the balance sheet being reported upon,| | | |together with a description and evaluation of any additional | | | |matters of a like natu re which come to his or her watchfulness | | | |up to the date the information is furnished.A review of capital| | | |disbursements for the period between the balance sheet date | | | |and completion of field work may besides reveal evidence of the | | | |settlement. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |3. |The purchase would normally be Revealed in general |The purchase of a vernal business is not an event that provides | | |conversations with the client and would provided be detected |evidence with respect to conditions existing at the balance | | |by reading the minutes of meetings of stockholders, |sheet date; hence, it does not require adjustments in the | | |directors, and appropriate committee.In addition, because |financial statements. However, such an event would normally be| | |the amount paid is likely to be signally large in relation |of such importance that disclosures of it is required to keep | | |to other funds disbursements, a review of c ash disbursements |the financial statements from being misleading. If the | | |for the period between the balance sheet date and completion |acquisition is significant enough, it power be advisable to | | |of field work is likely to reveal such an extraordinary |supplement the historical statements with pro-forma statements| | |transaction.Moreover, because a purchase of a business |indicating the financial results if the two firms had been | | |usually requires a formal purchase agreement, the letter from|consolidated for the year ending December 31, 19XO. Otherwise,| | |the firms legal counsel would probably have revealed the |disclosure in glosss to the financial statements would be | | |purchase. |adequate. Occasionally, a situation of this type may have such| | | |a material rival on the entity that the auditor may wishing to | | | |include in the audit report an explanatory paragraph order| | | |the readers attention to the event and its effect. | |4. instrument losse s attributable to a flood would be brought to |Losses attributable to floods subsequent to the balance sheet | | |the auditors attention through inquires and discussions with|date to not provide in formation with respect to conditions | | |corporate officers and executives. Moreover, the auditor |that existed at the balance sheet data; hence, adjustment in | | |would know the location of the plants and warehouses of |the financial statements is not required. However, because the| | |clients and upon becoming aware of any major floods in such a|losses are material, they should be revealed in footnotes to | | |location, he or she would investigate to determine if the |the financial statements. Occasionally, situation of this type| | |clients facilities had suffered any damage. may have such a material partake on the entity that the auditor| | | |may wish to include in the audit report an explanatory | | | |paragraph directing the readers attention to the event and | | | |its effec t. | |5. |The sale of bonds or other securities would require a filing |gross revenue of bonds or capital stock are transactions of the type | | |with the SEC in which the auditor would presumably be |that do not provide information with espect to conditions | | |involved. In addition, the sale would be revealed by reading |that existed at the balance sheet date; hence, adjustment of | | |the minutes of directors and finance committees meetings, by|the financial statements is not required. However, such gross gross revenue | | |corresponding with the clients attorneys and by examining |may be of sufficient importance to require footnote | | |the cash receipts books in the period subsequent to the |disclosure. Occasionally, a situation of this type may have | | |balance sheet date for evidence of unusually large receipts. such a material strike on the entity that the auditor may wish| | | |to in the audit report an explanatory paragraph directing the | | | |readers attention to t he event and its effect. | 19-28. (Estimated time †15 minutes) The substantive audit procedures that Young should apply when testing for loss contingencies relating to litigation, claims, and assessments include the following: • Read minutes of meetings of stockholders, directors, and committees. • Read contracts, loan agreements, leases, and other documents. • Read correspondence with impose and other governmental agencies. • Read correspondence with amends and bonding companies. Read realiseation replies information concerning guarantees. • prove with management the entitys policies and procedures for identifying, valuating, and accounting for litigation, claims, and assessments. • Obtain from management or the clients general counsel a description and evaluation of litigation, claims, and assessments. • Obtain written assurance from management that the financial statements include all accruals • and disclosures required by contention on Financial Accounting Standards No. 5. • study documents in the clients possession concerning litigation, claims, and assessments, including correspondence from lawyers. Obtain an analysis of professional fee expenses and review supporting invoices for indications of contingencies. • crave the clients management to prepare for transmittal a letter of inquiry to those lawyers consulted by the client concerning litigation, claims, and assessments. • Compare the lawyers solvent to the items in the letter of inquiry to the description and evaluation of litigation, claims, and assessments obtained from management. • Determine that the financial statements include proper accruals and disclosures of the contingencies. 19-29. (Estimated time †25 minutes) 1. Disagree. Generally letters silent on particular aspects of the request letter require follow-up.The auditor should contact the attorney and confirm that he or she mean the letter to compl etely respond to the request letter and was silent because there were no issues to discuss. support of this confirmation should be included in the working papers. 2. Disagree. A useful evaluation is not eer possible. For instance, it may include an element difficult to call off or to which the lawyer may not have paid sufficient attention to make an evaluation. If the matter involved constitutes a material or contingent liability, the auditor will likely conclude there is an uncertainty with effects on the financial statements that cant be determined, and he or she should consider the effects of that uncertainty on the audit report. 3. Disagree.The attorneys opinion is an example of a marginally acceptable opinion. If such an opinion is issued on litigation where loss would seriously impair the companys operations, the auditor must give a qualified opinion and possibly consider a disclaimer of opinion. 4. Disagree. In nigh cases, attorneys, auditors, and clients discuss matters involving litigation, and during such informal discussions some attorneys express their opinions as to the outcome of disputed matters. such(prenominal) oral opinions should be expressed in written material by the attorney, and if they are not reduced to writing, the discussions generally should not be considered audit evidence. 5. Disagree.The law firm derives all or substantially all of its fees from the client. This is, in essence, analogous to in-house counsel. Evidence from in-house counsel may provide the auditor with the necessary corroboration in some cases. However, since the liability here is great, complete reliance on such evidence is not justified. 19-30. (Estimated time †25 minutes) Other matters that Aldermans representation letter should specifically confirm that: • The financial statements referred to above are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. • We have made available to you all†• Financial re cords and related data. Minutes of the meetings of stockholders, directors, and committees of directors, or summaries of actions of recent meetings for which minutes have not yet been prepared. • on that point are no material transactions that have not been expertnessy recorded in the accounting records underlying the financial statements. • There has been no†• fraud involving management or employees who have significant roles in internal control. • Fraud involving others that could have a material effect on the financial statements. • Management believes that the effects of any uncorrected financial statement misstatements aggregated by the auditor during the current engagement and pertaining to the latest period presented are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. The following have been properly recorded or let out in the financial statements: • Related-party transactions, inc luding sales, purchases, loans, transfers, leasing arrangements, and guarantees, and amounts receivable from or payable to related parties. • Guarantees, whether written or oral, under which the company is contingently liable. • Significant estimates and material concentrations known to management that are required to be tell in accordance with the AICPAs Statement of coiffe 94-6, Disclosure of Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties. • There are no other liabilities or gain or loss contingencies that are required to be accumulated or disclosed by FASB Statement No. 5. • The company has satisfactory title to all own assets, and there are no liens or encumbrances on such assets nor has any asset been pledged as collateral. The company has complied with all aspects of contractual agreements that would have a material effect on the financial statements in the event of noncompliance. • Debt securities that have been classified as held-to-maturity ha ve been so classified due to the companys intent to hold such securities, to maturity and the companys ability to do so. in all other debt securities appropriately have been classified as available-for-sale or trading. • Provision has been made to reduce profusion or archaic inventories to their estimated net realizable value. • outstanding stock reserved for options, warrants, conversions, or other requirements have been properly disclosed. 19-31. (Estimated time †30 minutes) a.The use of boilersuit analytical review at the final stages of an audit has two general advantages to the CPA: (1) a bountiful view is obtained of the date of the financial statements, and (2) the CPAs attention is focussed on exceptions or variations in the data. A openhanded view of the data under audit is indispensable by the CPA to draw conclusions about the data as a whole. Merely looking at individual transactions may lead the auditor to overlook important variations in the unde rlying data. The industriousness of analytical procedures to the final data to obtain this full view requires a discerning analysis of the data, which results in overall conclusions upon which the CPAs audit satisfaction rests. The CPA is thusly able to satisfy him or herself as to the reasonableness, validity, and concord of the data in view of the surrounding circumstances.The cerebrate of the CPAs attention on exceptions or variations in the data results in a more efficient and scotch audit because there is a reduction in the amount of detailed testing which would be required, in the absence of overall checks, to uncover these exceptions or variations. Furthermore, manipulations of accounts may be revealed because the double-entry bookkeeping system extends the effects of manipulations to additional accounts, which will then bear a changed human relationship to other accounts. In addition, managerial problems and trouble vagrant will be highlighted for the CPA and may lead to the opportunity to be of additional service to the client. b.The ratios that a CPA may compute during an audit as overall checks on balance sheet accounts and related nominal accounts may include the following: • Accruals of individual expenses to related total expenses. • Calculations of the entity’s operating cycle. • various(prenominal) components of return on assets and return on equity. • The impact of an entity’s financing and investing activities. • The ability of cash flow from operations to service debt and dividends. • Other measures of the entity’s liquidity and solvency. c. 1. The possible reasons for a decrease in the rate of inventory turnover include the following: • Decline in sales. Increase in inventory quantities, intentional or unintentional. • Incorrect computation of inventory because of errors in pricing, extensions, or taking of physical inventory. • inclusion body in inventory o f slow-moving or obsolete items. • Erroneous cutoff of purchases. • Erroneous cutoff of sales under the perpetual inventory accounting method. • springy purchases. • Change in inventory valuation method. 2. The possible reasons for an increase in the number of days sales in receivable include the following: • Change in credit terms. • Decreasing sales. • Change in the sales mix of products with different sales terms. • Change in mix of customers. • Improper sales cutoff. Unrecorded sales. • Lapping. • slow-moving collections caused by tighter economic conditions or lowering of the grapheme of the receivables. 19-32. (Estimated time †20 minutes) a. Reportable conditions are matters that come to an auditors attention, which, in the auditors judgment, should be communicated to the clients audit committee or its equivalent because they represent significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal c ontrol structure, which could adversely affect the organizations ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements.Material weaknesses are reportable conditions in which the design or operation of specific internal control structure elements do not reduce, to a relatively low level, the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. b. An auditor is required to identify reportable conditions that come to the auditors attention in the normal course of an audit, but is not get to search for reportable conditions. The auditor uses judgment as to which matters are reportable conditions. Provided the audit committee has admit its understanding and consideration of such deficiencies and the associated risks, the auditor may decide certain matters do not need to be reported unless, because of changes in management or the audit committee, or because of the passage of time, it is appropriate to do so.Conditions noted by the auditor that are considered reportable should be reported, preferably in writing. If information is communicated orally, the auditor should document the communication. The report should state that the communication is intended solely for the information and use of the audit committee, management, and others within the organization. The auditor may identify and communicate separately those reportable conditions the auditor considers to be material weaknesses, but may not state that no reportable conditions were noted during the audit. Reportable conditions may be communicated during the course of the audit rather than after the audit is concluded. depending on the relative significance of the matters noted and -the urgency of disciplinal follow-up action. 19-33. (Estimated time †30 minutes) |a. |Deficiency | fit Wording | |1. |In completing our audit |In planning and performing our audit | |2. |Its internal control environment |Its internal control structure | |3. |Not to express an opinion |Not to provide assurance | |4. The design and effectiveness |The internal control structure and its operation | | |of the system 0f internal control | | |5. | below GAAS |Under standards | |6. |Potential weaknesses |Significant | |7. |To prepare financial |To record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent| | |statements in conformity |with the assertions of management in the financial statements. | |8. For the audit committee |For the information and use of the audit committee, management, and| | |and others |others | b. A reportable condition may be of such magnitude as to be a material weakness. Thus, all material weaknesses are reportable conditions, but all reportable conditions are not material weaknesses. The two terms ar e defined as follows: • Reportable conditions represent significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control structure, which could adversely affect the organizations ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. c. Two additional paragraphs are required when the auditor refers to material weaknesses in the audit report. The first paragraph should include a definition of a material weakness and a description of reportable conditions that are material weak nesses.The second paragraph should describe the limitations of the auditors work; i. e. , that the work would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are besides material weaknesses. 19-34. (Estimated time †20 minutes) a. Independent auditors use a management letter to call to managements attention matters that the auditor has noted during the course of the audit engagement but which did not fall within the scope of the opinion. The management letter provides an excellent vehicle for suggesting value-added run that can assist the business in change organizational performance. A management letter is rendered as a constructive service to suggest improvements as well as point out deficiencies. b.Many types of information can be covered in a management letter. The major, broad areas which are presented and discussed in the management letter include: • Suggestions for modifying and improving a clients internal controls. • Recommendations for changes an d improvements in accounting systems to better meet managements information needs. • Suggestions for improving the management of resources such as cash, inventories, and investments. • Comments regarding tax related matters. A detailed example of a suggestion for improving business radiation patterns follows: We understand that your accounting system offers discounts to customers who purchase in significant volumes.The schedule that grants these volume discounts as it prices a sales invoice does so after important information on gross margins has been reported to department managers. While sales invoices and underlying accounting information is correct, it does not agree with management information that is provided to sales managers as they make pricing decisions. As soon as possible you need to change the program that calculates the sales discounts so that gross margins and other information used by sales management includes the volume discounts offered customers. (An swer updated from original ICMA answer. ) 19-35. (Estimated time †30 minutes) a. 1. 1â€subsequent event during the subsequent event period requiring adjustment. 2. 1â€subsequent event during the subsequent event period requiring adjustment. 3. â€subsequent event during the subsequent event period requiring disclosure. 4. 2â€subsequent event during the subsequent event period requiring disclosure 5. 1â€subsequent event during the subsequent event period requiring adjustment. 6. 4â€subsequent event occurring after field work but before issuance of report. 7. 4â€subsequent event occurring after field work but before issuance of report. 8. 5â€postaudit discovery of facts existing at date of report. The date field work is completed is not specifically given. This answer is based on the customary practice of dating the audit report as of the end of field work (i. e. , February 26). b.For categories (1) and (2) the auditor has the responsibility for identifying and evaluating subsequent events up to the date of the auditors report. In discharging this responsibility, the auditor should be alert for subsequent events in performing substantive tests, and too perform specific auditing procedures at or near the completion of field work. For categories (3) and (4), the auditor has no responsibility to make inquiry or to perform any auditing procedures during this time period to discover subsequent events. However, if knowledge of such an event comes to the auditors attention, he or she should determine whether the event requires adjustment of or disclosure in the financial statements. For category (5), the auditor has no responsibility for their discovery.However, if the auditor becomes aware of such facts and the facts may have affected the report that was issued, the auditor is required to ascertain the reliability of the information. c. Information about the items would be obtained from the following: 1. Inquiry of management; client †Å"rep” letter. 2. Review of bad debt write-offs in January. 3. Reading of minutes. 4. remark of fire; newspaper account of fire; inquiry of management. 5. Inquiry of management; lawyers letter; and client â€Å"rep” letter. 6. Reading of minutes. 7. Newspaper story on coup; inquiry of management. 8. Inquiry of management; lawyers letter; and client ‘rep” letter.If the client fails to make required disclosure, the auditor should notify each member of the board of directors of such refusal and take the following steps to prevent further reliance on the audit report and: • Notify the client that the audit report must no longer be associated with the financial statements. • Notify regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the client that the report should no longer be relied on. • Notify (generally via the regulatory agency) each individual known to be relying on the statements that the report should no longer be relied on. |Cases | 19-36. See separate file with answers to the comprehensive case related to the audit of Mt. Hood Furniture that is included with this chapter. NOTE: several(prenominal) revisions were made to this problem to correct printing errors. The revise problem is posted on the student resources website. | 19-37. (Estimated time †25 minutes) a. and b. 1. The state governments approval of a plan for the construction of an express highway would have come to the CPAs attention through inquiries of officers and key personnel, examination of the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors and stockholders, and reading local newspapers. The details of the item would not have to be disclosed as a separate footnote because all firm assets of the corporation, including the right to the condemnation award, were to be sold as of March 1, 19X1. 2.It is improbable that the CPA would perk the source of the $25,000 unless it were revealed in a discussion with the president or his face-to-face accoun tant, or unless the auditor prepared the presidents personal income tax return, in which case the interest charges would have led to his investigation of the use to which the funds were put. scope out the loan in the balance sheet as a loan from an officer would be sufficient disclosure. The source from which the officer obtained the funds would not be disclosed because it is the officers personal business and has no effect upon the corporations financial statements. Indeed, disclosure of the funds source energy be construed as detrimental to the officer. 3. The additional liability for the ore shipment would have been revealed by CPAs scanning of January transactions. The CPAs regular xamination of 19XO transactions and related documents such as purchase contracts would have caused him or her to note the item for subsequent follow-up to determine the final liability. In addition, the clients letter of representation might have mentioned the potential liability. The item would not require separate disclosure by footnote or otherwise and would be handled by adjusting the financial statement accounts payable by the amount of the additional charge, $9,064 4. The CPA might learn of the agreement to purchase the treasurers stock ownership through inquiries of management and legal counsel, examination of the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors and stockholders, and subsequent reading of the agreement. The absence of the treasurer might also arouse the CPAs curiosity.The details of the agreement would be disclosed in a footnote because the use of company cash for the repurchase of stock and the change in the amount of stock held by stockholders might have a heavy impact on subsequent years financial statements. Usually a management change, such as the treasurers resignation, does not require disclosure in the financial statements. The details underlying the separation (personal disagreements and divorce) should not be disclosed because they are person al matters. 5. by inquiries of management, review of financial statements for January, scanning of transactions, and observations, the CPA would learn of the reduced sales and of the strike.Disclosure would not be made in the financial statements of these conditions because such disclosure might create doubt as to the reasons therefore and misleading inference might be drawn. 6. The contract with large Industries would come to the CPAs attention through inquiries of management and legal counsel, reading the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors and stockholders, and examination of the contract. All important details of the contract should be disclosed in a footnote because of the great effect upon the corporations future. The factors contributing to the entry into the contract need not be disclosed in the statements; while they might be of interest to readers, hey are by no means essential to make the statements not misleading. 19-38. (Estimated time †25 minutes) The omissions, ambiguities, and inappropriate statements and terminology in Browns letter are as follows: • The action that Consolidated intends to take concerning each suit (for example, to contest the matter vigorously, to look to an out-of-court settlement, or to appeal an adverse decision) is omitted. • A description of the progress of each case to date is omitted. • An evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of each case is omitted. • An estimate, if one can be made, of the amount or range of potential loss of each case is omitted. The various other pending or endanger litigation on which Young was consulted is not identified and included. • The unasserted claims and assessments probable of assertion that have a reasonable possibility of an unfavorable outcome are not identified. • Consolidateds understanding of Youngs responsibility to advise Consolidated concerning the disclosure of unasserted possible claims or assessments is omitted. • Materiality (or the limits of materiality) is not addressed. • The reference point to a limitation on Youngs response due to confidentiality is inappropriate. • Young is not communicate to identify the nature of and reasons for any limited response. Young is not requested to include matters that existed after December 31, 1992, up to the date of Youngs response. • The date by which Youngs response is needed is not indicated. • The reference to Youngs response possibly being quoted or referred to in the financial statements is inappropriate. • Vague terminology such as â€Å"slight” and â€Å"some chance” is included where â€Å"remote” and â€Å"possible” are more appropriate. • There is no inquiry about any free or unbilled charges, services, or disbursements. |Research Questions | For the reasons specified in the introduction to this manual, solutions are not provided for this category of questi ons.\r\n'