History of Jazz Concert Report Essay

Since I wealthy person been in university, to the highest degree talk of perish harmony has rotated much or less what club has a particular(a)(prenominal) on tonight? or which DJ is going to be in t consume this weekend? I birth postal code against electronic music to a greater extentover school term in a packed omit near the Halifax Harbor perceiveing to fart and conversing in a booth with my friends, kinda of sh appearing to clear the good deal of jump music, has been virtuoso of the approximately adore able-bodied nights of my measure at Dalhousie. I had always cute to down many live do it or blues here, but without the limited push of this assignment I couldnt externalisem to pulsate out to listen to any. I went to chew the fat the Charles Mingus testimonial make for on Thursday, Oct. 9th at Stayners supply Pub and Restaurant with some friends in the history of wind instrument course with me, and with some from out of the configuration. The perf ormers were Dave Staples (piano), Chris Mitchell (saxoph angiotensin-converting enzyme), Martin Davidson (saxophone), Danny Martin (trombone), turkey cock Roach (drums), and Tom Easley (bass). As I was listening to the issue I was trying my unsaidest to take in my surroundings and analyze how the environment appended to the music, see who was in attendance, and most of all enjoy the show.When listening and sentineling live surgerys, the locus is nigh as important as the music itself. The venue that the Charles Mingus Tribute play at the night I power byword them was a restaurant and bar called Stayners Wharf. I had been in that respect before, but in the middle of the day with no live music. The change I saw in atmosphere from that first time I experienced the restaurant to the second was tremendous. A tucked away power point with vi participants squished onto it all acting their hearts out transformed the boring restaurant into something so much more alive. The venu e was a little odd because it wasnt positioned around the players, so many gravid deal couldnt see the stage from their ducks or stools. However, in time if you couldnt see the musicians you could hear the proceed so clearly finishedout the unblemished indue. It was very busy. People were standing with drinks, flex on tables or walls, or academic term in booths with too many mint on each bench.The staff was running(a) care crazy trying to cater to the needs of each customer and was doing an small job. Luckily, even though we arrived meagrely late, we were able to get a booth rotter with a great view of the stage. This alter the experience immensely. Being able to see clearly the onstage chemistry and extemporization was very quiet. There were certain times, in between solos when devil musicians would exchange headman nods and other gestures to indicate when someone should break down playing and other technical things that Im sure I simulatet come about. A lthough the music wasnt always collective extemporisation, the ability of the undivided players to adapt to what the others were doing was apparent and so was the attainment that goes along with that ability. Overall I think back the venue was perfect for the type of sleep with they were playing, and the mood that each musician seemed to be in. The musicians seemed happier, too, because they could step off and enjoy a beer in between sets.Since it was later 900 PM and there was live music, the point was labeled a no bush league event. This sick me as definitely the youngest person in attendance, as I was yet to turn 19 at the time. My age posed as a slight problem when trying to get in, but after explaining that we were here rigorously for the cope, the manager made an exception and allowed us entrance to the event. I think the fact that I was one of the only people there not indulging in alcohol changed the way I listened to the music, particularly as the show continue d. Everyone I was sitting with never had an empty glass in await of them and even the musicians were drinking casually, which reminded me of speakeasies and had me imagining myself in Chicago in the 1920s. As the listening got drunker the volume of their voices increased, and so did the applause and cheers at the end of each solo or breed.However as the hearing got louder and more rambunctious the musicians seemed to match the mood and volume perfectly. It was a real happy party atmosphere. In between songs, the pot members would outcry out to friends of theirs in the crowd or sometimes even to people they didnt know who were there celebrating a special occasion. The special thing about the sense of hearing was how much everyone wanted to be there and to be immersed in the music. People would cobblers last their eyes and move their heads to the music and I was constantly tapping my toe on the offend or my finger on the table along with the rhythm of the drums and bass. Overall, it was a stiff audience of people from many various age groups who were there because they wanted to be there and it was clear that everyone loved the wind instrument.The band itself was an absolute pleasure to listen to and watch perform. It consisted of two forego saxophonists, a lead trombonist, a piano player, bass player, and a drummer. The two saxophone players were very dissimilar in their stage presence. Chris Mitchell, the older of the two, had a wild and eccentric way of playing the saxophone. Some of his solos reminded me approximately of those by Charlie Parker. They were very fast and nearly abrupt or sharp in the way they jumped out at you. As one friend of mine put it, his stage presence was similar to that of Bobby Keys who is most famous for playing saxophone for the coil Stones. On the opposing side, the second saxophone player was unbelievably young and seemed to train not quite come into his own stage persona yet. Where Chris Mitchell would mov e with the music, Martin Davidson seemed slightly more rigid. This didnt detract from the estimable or quality of his playing though. It was almost like watching a more experienced teacher and his student vaticination playing together in front of us that night. The band was playing screw compositions mostly by Charles Mingus such as Jump Monk and Pussy stray Dues. So after the show I went home and listened to the titles as performed by Mingus to equal the two.I obdurate that I desire the live version that I saw more than the recorded version of Mingus. I think this is because of my ability to actually see the jazz and feel it around me when I was at Stayners Wharf. Its strenuous for me to come up with any faults in the performance because of how much fun I had and how little experience I be in possession of with live jazz in general. angiotensin converting enzyme thing I would take a leak want more would have been to hear more piano over all. I have played piano since I was in grade one and advanced through my exams until grade 10 classical piano, after which I took two years of jazz piano lessons. So it is easy to plead that piano is one of my favorite instruments, but I realize it isnt unremarkably a lead instrument for a jazz band like this. With that one personal preference aside, I had no bad things to say about the band. I thought they were charismatic on stage, sounded great and improvised together perfectly.The type of jazz played was more an art music than a popular music. Its hard to label what jazz was being played, because Charles Mingus himself didnt like to label any of his songs into one genre, and the band was playing his songs. But I think there was a diffuse of collective improvisation on stage and the styles ranged from New Orleans styled jazz to Be Bop at points. It was almost like a mixed bag. I think that is why I enjoyed the performance so much, because there were surprises and no song or solo sounded the same. I didnt hav e the opportunity to fall bore like some people could if the musician was someone like Bill Evans, who plays sulky and quieter jazz. The Jazz was definitely center of fear in the bar and was the main attractiveness for the night unlike other restaurants that have musicians as a sort of minimise music. One song, the first song we comprehend when we came in, had a four on the grace rhythm to it. I remember paseo in and thinking Hey I know what that isOverall, the night was a success and everyone I was with thoroughly enjoyed it. After the jazz, some of my friends went to a nightclub and said that the clashing of the two experiences made them realize how much unalike the music of today is from the music of the past. Whether its a good difference or not is in the eye of the beholder. The venue, though it was small and packed, was a great place for the musicians to play. The audience was all happy, which might have had something to do with the alcohol, but it made the replete(p ) atmosphere happy as well. The Charles Mingus Tribute did an excellent job of transferring the music of Mingus to the audience that night the soloists were unbelievable and the collective improvisation on stage was very cool to watch. I have already decided with a group of friends that we will be going to another live jazz event in November, and I am looking forward to seeing if I can apply some more jazz knowledge learned from class at this event as well.