Manville Corporation Fiber Glass Group Series Essay

1. Why have Dr. Dolls comments precipitated a crisis?Because of the self-reliance perception is everything. Dr Doll would have to manage the immediate crisis due to this concept. concourse get out afraid of fibreglass from the moment they heard that fiberglass is excessively carcinogenic as asbestos alone it is appear less carcinogenic if comp ared with asbestos. The joint asbestos which comes out from Dr Dolls lip has created an atmosphere of worry among the stakeholders and reporters who attended the symposium. This is because asbestos was once a material banned from manufacturing2. Does Manville have an other(a) asbestos on its hands? In your judgment, who or what was responsible for the asbestos disaster?No, Manville has very not producing asbestos, It was the press or media to create an perception in open that fiberglass is actually a man-made asbestos. Thanks you Dr Dolls compare on asbestos and fiberglass, now Manville is facing with disaster. Manville should respons ible since at that moment asbestos was actually a dangerous material to be used moreover Manville or the asbestos manufacturer was keeping to conceal the fact. This action was then known to the usual and caused Manville to receive pressure from the stakeholder and filed for bankruptcy.3. What should Manvilles senior managers do in come across of Andersons news? Be sure to consider the followinga. Should they elapse with anyone? Who? What? How? When?Manvilles senior should held a meeting not only if among the CEOs but also with its employee in order to establish the crisis. They can plan to discuss about the solution to be used or suggestion which will return the truth of fiberglass to Manville. A communication established is inseparable in creating a link and understanding between the workers and the top manager. Manvilles top manager should communicate as soon as contingent once they heard of Andersons news since they have no a lot cadence to be wasted so that they can ca rry on with other plan which is essential in rebuilding the reputation of Manville.b. Should they descale back or exit the fiberglass business?This decision should be made by depends on the circumstance but it is not plausible that information flies faster in modern days. The top level of Manville should expect that the news was known to public at the time they do a meeting in the morning. Later on if they found that fiberglass is also giving less profit or the protest of public onto the production of fiberglass was too hard to be explained. Then they are better to exit the fiberglass. However if the major problem was only on to the cost or salary problem, Manville could try to scale back by firing some employee who they think deserve to be fired but sometimes firing might not the best way to visualise a companys survival instead it will diagnose the company looks selfish.c. Should they modify the fiberglass MSDS or label? How?In call of moral and also business ethic they shoul d modify MSDS. Previously, Manvilles MSDS only labeled itch-scratch, but actually it was believed that fiberglass is causing cancer, So Manville should lend additional info into the label but at the same time this label maybe will makes consumer unwilling to purchase fiberglass product. accordingly ,Manville can only keeping MSDS but they could seek for some other way else to regain trust from the public towards fibreglass