Transfer of Personal Data to a Third Country :: Safe Harbor Agreement Human Rights Essays

Transfer of Personal Data to a ternion Country I. Introduction1.) An old issue, growing in importance peeping the web, one can see that privacy on the Internet is a bigissue. Countless US or EU based world right ons initiatives are fightingfor the right to privacy. What is the reason for this?Although concerns almost consumers ability to nurse their privacyhave been in existence for decades, the Internet makes the issue moredelicate Businesses have access to a larger audience, which allowsthem to collect more info from more people. Furthermore, collection ofmore specific behavioural selective information is possible attaching cookies toa hard drive, reporting which websites someone enters.1 In addition,data collection and storage having become much easier, faster andcheaper, cost concerns do not limit data-collection practices.2At the same time, the market for information about consumers andconsumer behaviour is continuously growing, side by side with theexpansion of e-com merce.2.) description of the issuePrivacy can be defined as the right of the individual to be protectedagainst intrusion into his personal life or affairs, or those of hisfamily, by direct physical means or by publication of information.3This paper will focus purely on information privacy, also known asdata auspices, which means the rules presidential term the collection andhandling of personal data such as a persons name, address, phone subdue, family status, social security or other identification numberor even medical, financial or government records. Data protectionconcerns the process of gathering, storing, analysis and distributionof personal data. Privacy issues can be divided into relations withthe public sector and with the private sector.4 In this paper, Iwill concentrate on the private sector, especially relevant beca hold ofthe growing importance of e-commerce.3.) Fundamentally different approaches in the US and the EUatomic number 63 and the US have very different ap proaches to data protectionand privacy. In 250 years, nations on each side of the Atlantic haveevolved their democracies into distinct forms of federation and marketeconomy. Differences in culture, policies and society are theconsequence.a.) Government Interference vs. Self-RegulationAs discussed in seminar one, there is an ongoing dispute regarding theapproach in choosing an capable legal framework for the public andtransnational sphere of cyberspace near scholars want governments tointerfere as little as possible, others see the essential for a unifiedlegal framework. It seems that, concerning the privacy issue, the EUhas chosen the latter(prenominal) option, by imposing a comprehensive, general lawgoverning the collection, use and dissemination of data by public andprivate sector, whose enforcement is assured by an oversight body. TheUS tends to rely on sectoral laws, and on self-regulation for the